Products

Solutions

Resources

Search for API Security Tests

/

/

Check for Proper Error Handling

Check for Proper Error Handling

GitHub Copilot for Security
GitHub Copilot for Security
GitHub Copilot for Security

Ankita Gupta

Ankita Gupta

Ankita Gupta

Proper error handling is crucial in any application for both usability and security. Inadequate error handling can lead to unintended information disclosure, providing attackers with insights into the backend system, its frameworks, and its vulnerabilities. Implementing secure error handling practices can mitigate such risks.

Real-Life Scenario:

Consider the following error handling code in an Express.js application:

app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
    console.error(err.stack);
    res.status(500).send('Something broke!');
});

In this example, the application logs the stack trace and sends a generic error message to the client.

Engaging GitHub Copilot:

Prompt to GitHub Copilot: "Inspect this error handling code for security best practices."

Anticipated Copilot Analysis:

GitHub Copilot would review the error handling strategy and might respond with:


The provided error handling code in the Express.js application adheres to some security best practices but can be improved in the following ways:

1. **Information Disclosure**: The use of `err.stack` in `console.error` is standard for logging errors; however, ensure that such detailed error information is not exposed to the client. Detailed stack traces can provide attackers with insights into the underlying architecture and potential vulnerabilities.

2. **Generic Error Messages**: The code correctly sends a generic error message (`'Something broke!'`) to the client, which is a good practice to avoid information leakage. However, it could be enhanced by providing slightly more context to help the end-user understand what action to take next, without revealing sensitive details.

3. **Error Handling Granularity**: The error handler does not differentiate between different types of errors. Implementing more granular error handling, such as distinguishing between 4xx and 5xx status codes, can improve client-side error resolution and system diagnostics without compromising security.

4. **Logging and Monitoring**: Ensure that all errors, especially runtime exceptions, are logged to a secure, external logging service or a file with restricted access. This assists in monitoring and investigating incidents without exposing sensitive information to users.

5. **Rate Limiting and Monitoring**: Consider implementing rate limiting for error responses to prevent error-based attack tactics like forced browsing. Additionally, monitor error rates to detect and respond to potential attacks.

6. **HTTP Headers**: Ensure that appropriate HTTP headers are set in the error response to prevent caching of error pages and mitigate against clickjacking or other client-side attacks.

Here is a revised version of the error handling code considering these recommendations:

```javascript
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
    console.error(err.stack);  // Log the error internally

    // Differentiate between client-side and server-side errors
    const statusCode = err.status ? err.status : 500;
    const errorMessage = statusCode === 500 ? 'Internal Server Error' : err.message;

    // Set no-cache headers
    res.set('Cache-Control', 'no-store');
    res.set('X-Frame-Options', 'DENY');

    // Send the generic or specific error message
    res.status(statusCode).send(errorMessage);
});

By adopting these improvements, your application's error handling will be more secure and effective, providing necessary information to the users while protecting sensitive details and aiding system administrators in troubleshooting.

Common Pitfalls When Checking Error Handling with GitHub Copilot:

  1. Overreliance on Copilot's Feedback: GitHub Copilot is a powerful tool, but it's not perfect. It's essential to understand that it may not catch all security vulnerabilities or provide an exhaustive list of best practices. Always ensure to double-check and validate the feedback from Copilot against known security best practices.

  2. Limited Contextual Understanding: Copilot does not fully understand the context of your application. It can provide general advice, but it may not be aware of specific business rules, security requirements, or the application's unique aspects.

  3. Inadequate Testing: Even with advice from GitHub Copilot, it's important to test error handling code thoroughly. Automated tools can overlook some issues that only manual testing can uncover.

  4. Lack of Updates: Security best practices and vulnerability landscapes are constantly evolving. GitHub Copilot's training may not include the most recent information or reflect current best practices.

Remember, while GitHub Copilot can be a valuable tool for improving security, it should be part of a broader, comprehensive approach to application security.

On this page

Protect your APIs from attacks now

Protect your APIs from attacks now

Protect your APIs from attacks now

Explore more from Akto

Blog

Be updated about everything related to API Security, new API vulnerabilities, industry news and product updates.

Events

Browse and register for upcoming sessions or catch up on what you missed with exclusive recordings

CVE Database

Find out everything about latest API CVE in popular products

Test Library

Discover and find tests from Akto's 100+ API Security test library. Choose your template or add a new template to start your API Security testing.

Documentation

Check out Akto's product documentation for all information related to features and how to use them.